I've always been a strong opponent of masturbation.
No matter how the algorithm of @KaitoAI is optimized and changed, the final project will definitely be reduced to RBQ of network + AI
It's a simple truth, the current algorithm can't define [value]
It can only be speculated by a few indicators that the value of this content is [probably] high
How to judge whether an influencer is valuable through fan data?
As a result, there are indicators of common concern, indicators of big V interconnection, and indicators of project concern, and the so-called [ICT] identity is jointly constructed
How do you tell if a Tweet is valuable?
So refer to the number of views, comments, and retweets; comments on acquaintances; ICT reviews and more
However, the above indicators can be modified artificially
As a result, a lot of yap groups appeared, and a tweet was sent in, and N people replied. There are even jokes that have 150+ comments and likes, and the number of views has not exceeded 10,000
So there was an AI bot reply dressed in blue V. First brush up on the common concern, and then reply to the ICT in the comment area. As long as you break zero, you can infinitely AI post and AI reply.
And what is valuable to fans?
You are not as good as a hundredfold CA if you are a few thousand words at length
Let's talk about hair. What we lack is not a lack of projects, but interaction strategies and risk reminders.
Throughout the AI article, there is no meaning except for noise.
And for the KOLs themselves, the value is not only reflected in the number of followers and tweet views
Since December last year, I have been combing through hundreds of noteworthy lists and mining alpha through their common concerns. In the process, in the early projects found, there are often a few acquaintances @0x_xifeng @kaisi420 in the co-relationship list
Take @kaisi420 as an example, with 1.3W followers and almost no tweets. Who would know that he was actually very good at finding alpha?
So, really block the keywords of these projects, and clean yourself up...
@Punk9277
One of the KOLs who said before that they frantically post AI posts every day and irresponsibly use Twitter as a place for excretion was @cryptobraveHQ pointed out 😂😂
To be honest, a large part of the reason for the poor reviews of @KaitoAI is that they don't care about the feelings of their readers or the opinions of others.
Although the previous hair studio was rolled, it did not affect those who did not participate. Now even if you block these people, what they do is still affecting the interests of others through various factors.
Including giving money 💰 and chips, hoping that infofi can really play a role in promotion through @KaitoAI, after all, they are more than anyone willing to see their precious chips being prostituted by the tricks of the AI algorithm.
Yesterday's live broadcast @TK_Humanity said that the reason why he did the secondary screening of Yapper was that he found that some helpers were masturbations, and some were matrix numbers, which didn't help the project, so he didn't want to give it.
Maybe in the next @Punk9277 maybe we can really consider managing these super "airdrop hunters" and adding some metrics like "loyalty" or "maximum participation".
Because it is impossible for normal humans to pay attention to and produce more than a dozen projects such as sows at the same time, otherwise the project party will really make their own lists one by one, and it will be a lose-lose situation.
Mouth jerking also needs to be "anti-witch". 😂😂
20.35K
47
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.