Huma finance Token price

The HUMA leaderboard seems to be back to normal, and I see that the friends who often write have gradually returned to the list, causing my ranking to drop accordingly. Once again, I counted the number of SF for the bloggers on the list, and the distribution is as follows: -> 0-10: 5 -> 10-50: 27 -> 50-100: 15 -> 100-200: 15 -> Over 200: 38 The lowest SF count is 2, indicating that the current HUMA leaderboard no longer considers the SF count. However, the Wider Community is not displayed, probably because @KaitoAI is still processing it in the background. Additionally, I observed other project leaderboards, and it seems there are no changes. It is estimated that the new leaderboard is the result of communication between the @humafinance team and Kaito. ------------ This algorithm update has created two opposing groups; influential KOLs must be happy, as the participation of small accounts has been eliminated, making it indeed easier to get on the list with just casual writing. Small accounts are the most vocal against this change due to their inability to meet the threshold for the list, as it directly affects their interests. However, everything should be viewed from both sides; raising the threshold has its reasons, and lowering it has its intentions. KOLs, as the main promoters of projects, find that the reach of an article is often more important than its quality. For comparison, in live-streaming sales, Li Jiaqi can achieve better results in one minute than 99% of carefully prepared small bloggers can in a year. If you were a manufacturer, who would you choose? Quality or high traffic? Learning to consider issues from the perspective of the project side is essential to understanding the logic behind the algorithm. If you only consider your own interests, the results you want may contradict the laws of market operation. -------- As infoFi has developed to this day, the interests of all parties are intertwined, and how to select the bloggers that the project side wants has become a pressing issue for Kaito. Setting the threshold too high discourages small accounts, while setting it too low allows a flood of AI bots to enter. Distributing promotional rewards to those who deserve it will be a continuous problem for Kaito to solve. I believe @Punk9277 will balance the interests of all parties and become a master of moderation. Go Kaito!

Changes in the HUMA rankings under Kaito's new policy Before the new policy, my HUMA ranking was around 50, but after the new policy, my ranking has improved, currently at 30D Top 17. It's not because I write more or better, but because many friends who do not comply with the new regulations have been removed from the Top 100 and moved to the kids' table. This includes @AirdropAlchemis, whose fan traffic far exceeds mine. To be honest, I think it's unfair. Even though @humafinance is one of the two projects I recognize the most this year, I believe my internal recognition ranking could enter the Top 100, but in terms of tweet quality, views, and quantity, it is far less than Alchemy. So where does the problem lie? Is it the excessively high weight of SF quantity? The SF quantity statistics of bloggers in the HUMA 30D Top 100 rankings are as follows: 1⃣ 100 and below: 3 2⃣ 100-200: 25 3⃣ Above 200: 72 My SF quantity: 162, falling in the middle range of 100-200, while Alchemy's SF quantity is 103, at the bottom of the 100-200 range. Only 4 bloggers in the Top 100 have SF below 103, and the three with SF below 100 have quantities of: 49, 75, 87. From the data, if your SF is below 49, no matter how hard you write, you are unlikely to make it to the HUMA rankings. And if your SF quantity does not reach a certain threshold, even if your Twitter operation is as strong as Alchemy, you will also miss out on the rankings. So not making it to the rankings is not because you didn't write hard enough or well enough, but simply because the rankings have set a threshold, and until you reach that threshold, your efforts are unlikely to be rewarded. Just like X's ad revenue, if you don't meet the 3M 5 million views standard, Musk won't give you a penny. Returning to the original question, this world itself has no absolute fairness; whether it's a platform or an individual, they can only compete in a relatively fair environment. Perhaps Kaito can set a cfg file in the backend, allowing project parties to set various threshold parameters required for the rankings, selecting the people they want on a data level.