It seems that PortaltoBitcoin has been yapping for about a week now.
They have made roughly the same number of postings as Anoma, but while Anoma can't even get close to the leaderboard, @PortaltoBitcoin is gradually climbing up at least as of the last 7 days.
As of now, they haven't made it into the top 100 based on the 30-day criteria, but according to the criteria of the Gomtu site, it seems they are almost there. Currently, the top 100 is based on a threshold of 0.15%, and with my 0.1413%, it looks like with a little more effort, I could enter the top 100.
Separately, it was mentioned yesterday that the PortaltoBitcoin intern has made frequent mistakes. For instance, labeling the China allocation as the Japan allocation, or posting their ticker as PBT instead of $PTB.
Of course, one cannot completely rule out the possibility of it being a high-level strategy (for example, they mentioned that the PBT token would be listed in August, not ours... haha, there are such things, but realistically, it seems that the intern handling the PortaltoBitcoin account has a significantly low accuracy).
There is also speculation based on a post that used some emojis, suggesting that since they used an emoji that seems to be from the 17th, it might mean a listing on the 17th. However, for now, I expect it to happen sometime in August, and if it has been decided, I think discussions regarding listings with exchanges are currently underway.
The most important part for the yappers is whether the snapshot has been taken or not, and PortaltoBitcoin has stated that it has not been taken yet. It is also worth noting that among previous projects, there have been cases where they claimed no snapshot was taken, but in reality, they had already requested snapshot data from Kaito. (Koreans have had some experiences with that project as well.) Of course, I don't think PortaltoBitcoin will be like that. (It is a bit unsettling seeing the intern's work, but I don't think so haha)
Today, I briefly greeted people in the Discord, and it seems like there are quite a few people here who are genuinely putting in a lot of effort.
Personally, I don't really like chat rooms that much. It's not real conversation going back and forth; rather, people are constantly pouring themselves into the chat room with the sole purpose of investing time and effort to climb the rankings.
In fact, I think that aside from those who have already reached the highest levels, there isn't much to gain through chat rooms.
For those who are working hard in the chat rooms, like @PortaltoBitcoin, it might be a disheartening theory, but just looking at the current numbers of online members:
BitJelly - 33 members (purple)
Galactic Jelly - 222 members (yellow)
MoonJelly - 540 members (blue)
Crusader Jelly - 1648 members (green)
It seems that at one moment, there are about 2500 people online in Discord who have roles. Considering that the number of people online is usually limited, if we multiply that by about x2-x5, we would get the normal total number of users. (If I had admin rights, I could see the exact number of members, but since I'm not an admin, I can only make an estimate.)
This means that at least around 5000 to as many as over 10,000 people have one or more Discord roles. The number of tokens that can be distributed to this many people seems limited when assigned to specific roles.
The reason is that from the project's perspective, they are creating various badge systems to distribute tokens, and I think it would be simpler to access based on the number of badges held without a significant gap between them. (Just my speculation!!! Just my speculation!! It could be 100% wrong)
So for Koreans, while it's important to keep track of badges, I think that targeting the Korean allocation through yapping might be the most efficient approach.
821
22
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.