In the stillness of the night. It's time to write. I just shared some thoughts in the @jager_BSC Chinese group. I hope that friends from the retail community and KOLs who are moved by the $JAGER project, with a team commitment of BNB $100,000, community-first, and transparency, will read this article and help share it. I've been observing the trading on V2 and V3. Currently, V3 is not aggregated, but it has only addressed the issue of large purchases in V2's Alpha. There are very noticeable changes in V2's trading volume and alpha holdings. The team still needs to listen more to the community's suggestions. I remember that this viewpoint was also mentioned by a community whale, Brother Jie, before. Looking at it now, a significant impact is: whether JAGER can aggregate the USD1 V3 0-tax pool on the Alpha and BN wallet exchange interface in the future. One is whether everyone in the relevant community, including myself, who has made V3 USD1-JAGER LP can earn more fees. The other is that a 0-tax pool will more effectively promote trading compared to the 5% V2 pool. This is more beneficial for community members who adhere to the team's 3,3 principle. Management and community members should consider my judgment. Please provide feedback to the team (I have already left a message) + see how much support there is in the community. Legitimate requests can be made, including KOL friends if there are contact channels, still need to communicate with ALPHA and BN wallet regarding these matters. The issue here is that there are not only buyers but also sellers. A 0-tax pool is a significant demand for traders. Only the V3 USD1 0-tax pool can accommodate high-frequency trading needs and attract traders. Currently, on-chain operations on Pancake are manual, and although the community is actively adding to the pool: TVL and trading volume have significantly increased. However, it still requires some on-chain operations. The alpha and BN non-custodial wallets are truly the largest entry points. Aggregating the V3 0-tax pool is something that requires the entire community and team, including us KOLs, to push hard together. It concerns: V2 trading volume (which will be affected by V3 price fluctuations), the benefits of V3 LP fees for those participating in 3,3, and whether JAGER can move towards the mainstream. To move towards the mainstream, the 0-tax pool must be aggregated. I hope everyone takes my viewpoint seriously. I have a very accurate perspective on project judgment and trend analysis.
@jager_BSC My square. The tags are set. The jager community should retweet, comment, and interact to spread it. This will help the square gain more traffic and let more people see it.
The team @jager_BSC There are no issues with the token model and path. However, when it comes to communication and clarifying the main point, it's important to explain what the collective interests are, where they come from, and how the community can follow up. This is quite a significant issue.
Show original
98
10.43K
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.