Most chains subsidize growth. Abstract recycles it.
And that one design shift might outlast every token incentive in crypto.
Let me show you why Panoramic Governance is the most overlooked breakthrough in Web3 economics: 👇🧵
1/ Everyone’s chasing points, yield, and airdrops.
Meanwhile, Abstract is doing something different:
> Paying builders in real protocol revenue not speculative emissions.
> No tokens printed. No grants. Just live value routing.
> And CT is missing it.
2/ Let’s talk about how most L2s grow:
Arbitrum → 50 million $ARB STIP emissions
Optimism → Quests + OP farming
Base → RetroPGF, points metas
ZkSync → "Farming but trust us" incentives
It works short-term…
But it’s a game of burn → hope → repeat.
3/ Abstract said: what if we just…paid people using real usage?
That’s where Panoramic Governance comes in:
An incentive engine powered by sequencer fees not token inflation.
- No promises. No begging.
- Just value in → value out.
4/ Here’s how it works:
i/ Users interact with apps
ii/ Each tx pays a sequencer fee
iii/ Fees go into a shared pool
iv/ Governance decides where it flows:
- Games
- Builders
- Creators
- Ecosystem tools
Real money. Real routing. In real time.
5/ It’s like if Uniswap fees went back to protocols building on top of it.
Or if Apple let devs vote on where App Store profits go.
Abstract is creating a live revenue feedback loop not one-time grants.
That’s regenerative crypto.
6/ Let’s be blunt:
Most chains say “stick around and we’ll reward you later.” Abstract says “if you create value today, you earn from it today.”
No emissions. No retroactive clout.
Just plug-and-earn.
7/ Here’s the loop that makes it work:
> Apps bring users
> Users generate fees
> PG rewards high-impact apps
> Apps improve → attract more users
> Ecosystem grows organically
It’s not farming.
It’s value compounding.

8/ So why isn’t CT talking about this?
Because we’re trained to think “governance = slow”
And “fees = boring”
But on Abstract:
> Governance = live capital allocator
> Fees = programmable ecosystem fuel
> Builders = revenue partners, not expense lines
9/ If you're chasing yield, go farm.
If you're building a real product, go where value is recycled not extracted.
Abstract isn't a chain you build on.
It’s a chain you build with. ✳️
👇 RT + reply if you find this thread useful
Thank you
4
4.91K
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.