going a little bit against the grain here, but i liked this dialogue today this is why i think digital reputation is so important today, we've seen this review of zagabond, written by serpin, founder of the platform, ethos, circulating around twitter from seeing their back and forth, i think they will both learn more about each other, truth vs optics, and lead to confirmation one way or the other personal thoughts: • as the founder of a reputation platform, i dont think the founder, regardless of who it is, should write negative reviews unless they have a direct experience or it's an extreme case like SBF • in this case, i dont think serpin meant to use it as rage bait, or marketing at all, it was just his personal opinion as a crypto participant (will adapt and recognize difference over time) • if his priority was new users, it would have been accompanied by moves like waitlists, email capture, etc. • unfortunately i think theres a few people who think the same about azuki and zagabond because of past bullsh*t spewed, by people like pauly (felon on the run) • this is an opportunity to spread truth and reality • if on-chain reputation existed then, i dont think people would have listened to a loud twitter account • on-chain reputation now acts as a new variable (used to be intangible) alongside vanity metrics (likes, impressions, comments, RTs, etc.) • everything is on-chain so how does this speak on serpin as a founder? as both founders have a conversation, his next moves will be observed! from then everyone's digital reputation will be at play slightly selfish, but im very excited to watch how this plays out we're seeing blockchain technology actually used alongside the social layer which is my passion

@Zagabond @0x5f_eth heavy vouch