Degen opportunities, no tokens issued yet, continue to be proactive. This is a high-certainty opportunity with more foreigners and fewer locals. (You can try searching Twitter for #somnia) ⬇️ These points all indicate that somnia has value gap attributes. Maybe I'm just a bit more perceptive than you, but this simple logic should be understandable, right? -1. @Somnia_Network hasn't issued tokens yet. -2. Somnia doesn't have new assets yet, but searching "somnia" and "Bambi" on Twitter reveals various appearances of this koala. -3. Somnia hasn't launched on a top-tier platform yet. -4. Somnia hasn't launched a top-tier game yet; I've observed for a few days, and during this time, they have consistently updated and supported some games (the official stance is friendly towards the GAMEFI track). -5. Somnia hasn't launched a launcher yet, but the ecosystem has the conditions to incubate excellent infrastructure. -6. The trading volume on the testnet has been increasing day by day, reaching 1 billion today. 2⃣ Somnia recently did an NFT preheat, and the blind box just opened. With this little gray bear image doing various IPs, there's a high probability of subsequent new assets, which is an opportunity to enter at a low value gap. Choosing to first do NFTs is probably considering compliance issues, and they are doing quite well in this regard. Compliance is a trend, and it will better accommodate large funds in the future, facilitating cooperation with some leading institutions. NFTs are indeed not very popular right now, but influenced by global trendy IP POPMART, the acceptance of virtual character economies may be more open this time. Kaito also supports cooperation; in the Pre-TGE rankings, Somnia is in the top 10, and yapper interactions are mainly with overseas KOLs. 3⃣ Currently, the market is full of fake DEV, fake narratives, and fake preheats that can't get off the ground. Compared to the current situation where a bunch of bundled KOL small accounts launch to eat up market traffic with the conspiracy of "fake MEME." Somnia's early NFT approach feels a bit old school, with real investment costs and a solid project team behind it, slowly building ecological consensus. In fact, compared to the current environment filled with traps and cash flow schemes, I'm more willing to invest a bit. It allows true community builders to gain benefits and welfare, while the consensus is also stronger. For those who don't like NFTs, you can also pay attention to the opportunities behind this public chain. Somnia definitely has reasons to create new assets; from a technical perspective, it is the fastest and most efficient EVM L1, capable of handling millions of on-chain user transaction requests simultaneously, with 1M TPS. As we all know, most KOLs are quite superficial; they take advantage and run, and even if they sell off, they claim to have made a profit, showing no long-term loyalty to individual projects. So why do you see some KOLs inexplicably daring to heavily invest in certain projects they've never heard of before, with no clear backing upon research? The addresses with clear backing aren't even delivering, claiming to be losing money, while in reality, their small accounts have already profited from low-priced exchanges. This isn't aimed at everyone, but it is a real situation. Perhaps there will be continuous opportunities in the gaming sector later on. Recent market performance shows that smart money has shifted from playing pure air MEME to projects supported by some light DEFI frameworks, and the friendly and low-education-cost carrier for light DEFI is GAMEFI. Somnia has also put a lot of effort into the gaming sector, and I believe that smart project teams within the ecosystem will also use new assets to attract traffic.